shared storagepost-productionNASSANcloud storagevideo editingstorage solutions

Shared Storage for Video Editing: NAS vs SAN vs Cloud (2026)

· Updated

If your editors are still passing hard drives around or waiting on file copies, shared storage will reclaim hours every week. The real decision isn’t whether you need shared storage, but which model fits your team, budget, and workflows.

This guide compares NAS, SAN, and cloud-based shared storage specifically for post-production teams.

What Shared Storage Actually Means in Post-Production

Shared storage is a central media pool that multiple editors, colorists, and audio engineers can access simultaneously, without duplicating footage on each workstation.

Key workflow benefits:

  • No more file copying: Open projects directly from shared storage instead of shuttling drives.
  • Real-time collaboration: Multiple editors can work on the same project at once.
  • Single source of truth: One master copy of every media file, always current.
  • Simplified backup: Protect one storage system instead of a dozen machines.
  • Faster onboarding: New staff and freelancers get instant access to existing projects.

NAS: Network Attached Storage for Video Editing

A NAS (Network Attached Storage) is a dedicated file server on your network that shares storage over standard Ethernet. It’s the most common first step into shared storage for small and mid-sized post teams.

How NAS Works for Video Teams

Your NAS lives on the same LAN as your edit workstations. Systems from TrueNAS, QNAP, and Synology expose shares via SMB or NFS, which are natively supported by:

  • Adobe Premiere Pro
  • DaVinci Resolve
  • Avid Media Composer (for media, not full Avid project sharing)

The critical performance factor is network bandwidth. For serious post-production, plan on 10GbE as your baseline.

NAS Performance Benchmarks

Approximate real-world throughput:

  • 1GbE NAS: ~110 MB/s

Suitable for: proxy editing, compressed HD, light workloads.

  • 10GbE NAS (HDD RAID): ~800–1,000 MB/s

Suitable for: 4K ProRes, DNxHR, multicam HD.

  • 10GbE NAS (SSD cache + HDD): ~1,000–1,200 MB/s

Suitable for: mixed 4K/6K editorial and finishing.

  • 25GbE NAS (all-SSD): ~2,500+ MB/s

Suitable for: 8K RAW, heavy color, high track counts.

Where NAS Fits (and Where It Doesn't)

NAS gives you local-speed access to your media and full control over your data. There are no monthly per-terabyte fees, no egress charges, and no third-party access policies. For studios handling sensitive client content or working toward TPN compliance, keeping active media on-premises can also make security audits simpler.

There's a big difference between a general-purpose NAS (TrueNAS, Synology, QNAP) and a media-tuned NAS built for editorial: SNS EVO, ProMAX, Facilis, EditShare, GB Labs, and Avid NEXIS. The media-tuned systems add project locking and bin sharing for Avid and Premiere Productions, per-user bandwidth management, and support teams who know what "dropped frames on the third multicam angle" means. They also cost more. For teams under five editors, a well-configured general-purpose NAS is usually enough.

The tradeoffs: NAS means upfront capital cost, physical space, power, cooling, and someone who knows how to maintain it. Drives fail, RAID arrays need monitoring, and capacity planning means buying hardware before you need it.

SAN: Storage Area Network for High-End Post

A SAN gives every workstation block-level access to a shared pool of disks over a dedicated storage network, usually Fibre Channel, sometimes iSCSI or NVMe-over-Fabrics. A shared filesystem layer (Quantum StorNext, Tiger Technology, or similar) lets multiple machines mount the same volume at once without corrupting it.

The difference you feel is consistency. A NAS shares bandwidth over the same Ethernet your workstations use for everything else, and performance can sag when the whole team hits play at the same time. A SAN gives you dedicated, predictable throughput per seat, which is why it's still the standard in finishing, color, and large broadcast facilities.

When SAN Makes Sense

  • 8+ editors working on 4K/8K camera originals at the same time
  • Color grading and finishing rooms that need guaranteed real-time playback
  • Facilities with dedicated engineering staff to run it
  • Workflows built around Avid bin locking at scale

When SAN Is Overkill

For most small and mid-size teams, a modern 25GbE or 100GbE NAS with an all-flash or flash-cached array gets close enough to SAN performance at a fraction of the cost and complexity. Fibre Channel switches, HBAs in every workstation, and metadata controllers add up quickly, and a SAN with nobody to maintain it is a liability.

Cloud Shared Storage for Video Editing

Cloud shared storage puts your media in S3-compatible object storage and streams it to editors wherever they are. Modern platforms have closed most of the performance gap. They come in three flavors:

  • Streaming filesystems. LucidLink, Suite Studios, Shade, and Strada mount cloud storage as a local drive and stream only the parts of a file the editor is actually playing. Editors scrub 4K timelines over normal internet connections.
  • Native S3 bit-streaming. Tools like Object Mount let NLEs read directly from object storage. This category is moving fast in 2026.
  • Sync-based. Dropbox, Resilio, and Google Drive copy full files to each machine. Simple, but slow to start and expensive in local disk for large projects.

For distributed teams, cloud is often the only practical option: editors in different cities or countries get the same asset library with consistent performance. It also scales from terabytes to petabytes without anyone touching a server rack.

The Real Cost of Cloud Storage

The tradeoff is ongoing monthly cost that scales with usage. Watch for three line items:

  1. Storage per TB per month. Ranges widely by provider and tier.
  2. Egress fees. Charges every time media is downloaded. On AWS this is often the biggest surprise on the bill.
  3. API and minimum-retention charges. Small per file, but they add up with image sequences and proxies.

S3-compatible platforms like PostForward E2 storage include 3x your stored data in free egress each month and charge no API or minimum-retention fees, but you're still paying rent on your data every month. For large archives that rarely get touched, that adds up. Run your own numbers with our cloud storage cost calculator.

Cloud Performance Requirements

Streaming filesystems are only as good as the connection under them. As a working baseline:

  • Proxy or HD editorial: 100–300 Mbps per editor
  • 4K ProRes / DNxHR from camera originals: 500 Mbps–1 Gbps per editor, plus a large local cache SSD
  • Color and finishing: usually still belongs on local fast storage

The Hybrid Approach: What Most Teams Actually Need

Most creative teams we work with land on a hybrid model. It usually breaks into three tiers:

  • Online (hot): active projects and camera originals being cut. Lives on NAS or SAN over 10GbE+, flash or flash-cached.
  • Nearline (warm): recently wrapped projects, revisions, stock and library footage. Lives on cloud object storage or a high-capacity HDD NAS.
  • Archive (cold): finished projects you must keep but rarely open. Lives on LTO tape, S3 Glacier-class storage, or offline drives.

Active projects live on fast local storage during production. When a project wraps, it moves to cheaper cloud storage for long-term retention and client access, and eventually to archive. Our post-production archive strategy guide covers the cold tier in detail.

A media asset management platform like iconik ties the tiers together, giving your team one search interface across local and cloud storage. Editors find what they need without knowing or caring where the file physically lives.

How Much Storage and Bandwidth Do You Need?

Size for simultaneous streams, not just capacity. Approximate per-stream data rates for UHD at 23.98–29.97 fps:

  • H.264/H.265 proxies: 2–10 MB/s
  • ProRes 422: 60–75 MB/s
  • ProRes 422 HQ / DNxHR HQX: 90–110 MB/s
  • ProRes 4444: 130–170 MB/s
  • Camera RAW (BRAW, R3D, ARRIRAW): 50–400+ MB/s depending on compression

Those are single streams, and editors rarely play just one. A typical corporate timeline has a two-camera interview, B-roll, and graphics stacked on top, so we plan for at least two full-quality video layers per editor plus headroom. In practice that means budgeting 250–400 MB/s sustained per editor for 4K ProRes work. It's more than the math strictly requires, and that margin is what keeps playback smooth when everyone hits play during a deadline.

Multiply that by the number of editors working at the same time. A four-editor team cutting 4K ProRes needs roughly 1,000–1,600 MB/s sustained. That's past what a single 10GbE link delivers in practice (about 1,100 MB/s), which is why we usually spec 25GbE to the storage for teams of that size.

Your network matters as much as your disks. If you're planning a 10GbE or 25GbE rollout, our guide to networking for post-production covers switch selection, VLANs, and dual-NIC workstation setups.

How to Choose: NAS vs SAN vs Cloud

  • 1–5 editors, same building, HD to 4K: 10GbE NAS, general-purpose or media-tuned.
  • 5–15 editors, heavy 4K, Avid or Premiere Productions: media-tuned NAS on 25GbE.
  • 10+ seats, 8K or finishing, dedicated engineering: SAN, or a high-end NAS on 100GbE.
  • Distributed or freelance-heavy team: cloud streaming filesystem with a local cache.
  • Most growing teams: hybrid. A fast local tier for active work, cloud for nearline and remote access, LTO or Glacier for archive.

If your team is fully co-located and values raw speed above all else, NAS-first makes sense. If you're distributed or scaling fast, lean cloud-first. If you're somewhere in between (most teams are), a hybrid setup puts fast storage where you need it and cheaper storage everywhere else.

We help teams design storage architectures that match how they actually work, not how a vendor thinks they should work. Our post-production storage consulting starts with an audit of what you have. If you're wrestling with this decision, book a free 30-minute call and we'll talk through the specifics of your workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions

NAS vs SAN vs cloud storage: which is right for professional video editing?

For under 4 editors on HD or short-form 4K, a well-spec'd off the shelf NAS over 10GbE is usually enough. For 6+ editors on heavy 4K/8K timelines, custom NAS or SAN spec'd appropriately is key. Cloud (LucidLink, SuiteStudios, Shade, Strada, S3-style) is the right call when you need geographic flexibility or remote contributors. Most working studios end up hybrid: SAN or fast NAS for active editorial, cloud for everything else.

What storage do I need for 4K/8K collaborative video editing?

For 4K ProRes with 4-6 simultaneous editors, budget 250-400 MB/s sustained per editor. SAN over 16Gb Fibre Channel handles this comfortably. NAS over 25/40GbE works if the switching is solid and the array isn't oversubscribed. 8K and high-frame-rate camera originals push the numbers 4-6× higher, and you're well into SAN or high-end NAS territory at that point.

Is object storage suitable for video post-production?

Traditionally no for active NLE editing, because object storage doesn't expose a filesystem the way editors need. That's changing fast: Object Mount ships native S3 bit-streaming today, SuiteStudios launches Q3 2026, LucidLink is in enterprise beta, and PostForward is launching a resold streaming platform later this year. For everything else (proxies, archives, dailies, delivery masters), object storage is already the natural fit. Pair it with a MAM that handles the proxy layer and editors get filesystem-feeling access without paying SAN prices for cold data.

How much shared storage does a small post-production team need?

Rule of thumb: 10-20 TB per editor of fast-tier storage for a typical commercial workload, more for narrative or documentary work with long-form camera originals. A 4-person team usually starts at 60-100 TB usable on hot storage, plus a warm tier (cloud or object storage) 2-3× that size for finished work waiting on revisions.

Can cloud storage replace a SAN for video editing?

For many workflows, yes. LucidLink, Suite Studios, Shade, and Strada have proven you can edit native 4K media off a cloud-attached share over normal internet. The catch: latency-sensitive work (color grading, audio mixing, real-time multicam) still benefits from local fast storage. Most studios using cloud-SAN platforms keep a local fast tier for finishing and use cloud for everything else.

Need help with your workflow?

Book a free consultation and let's discuss your setup.

Book a Free Call